Trader
2616 Points
Joined August 2009
Since gift tax act is abolished and no provisions are exported or imported anywhere, then the valuation method you have found should be acceptable to the department as this is a valuation method in force and since the rules specify nothing for this, a government accepted practice should be accepted.
Earlier, for gift tax purpose lower of the values used to be taken and a further 20% used to be deducted. Now we have to go as per income tax act. Therefore ideally the situation calls for 'what is most beneficial to the assessee' should prevail. Therefore I think what would be the lower of the values in the accepted formulas should be accepted. It is better a clarification is taken on this. As far as movable properties being gifted is concerned, I rarely come accross people making gifts of listed share but there are a lot of gifts and even transactions for inadequate consideration in unlisted and pvt. ltd. companies. Therefore a clarification is due. However, as far as gifting in Pvt. Ltd. companies is concerned or even unlisted companies is concerned, it is usually between close relatives in most cases or as a result of family settlement. That would also be close relatives.
Problem is coming up only when an unlisted company is sold or control by transfer of shares is sold to individual / huf then the problem of inadequate consideration comes up.
We have to always remember that this is taxable at the hands of an individual / huf and not a company or a firm or even the new llps.
Individual / HUF will bear the tax on IFOS if they receive these shares of unlisted companies or private limited companies or they purchase them for a price lower than FMV as per the formula.
Maybe if an employee receives shares of listed / unlisted companies at lower than FMV, he is already paying a tax on perquisites for the ESOP. Therefore he should not be taxed again on IFOS as there is definitely no intention for double taxation.