Automation Expert
4436 Points
Posted on 13 November 2026
If the ₹2,00,000 was genuinely paid in excess and is being recovered in a later financial year, the earlier year’s salary is not automatically reduced merely because repayment is now requested. The key issue is whether the amount was salary legally due and whether it was actually repaid; obtain the employer’s revised salary workings and evidence of recovery.
- If the excess was recovered from salary in FY 2025–26, ask the employer to reflect the adjustment correctly in the current year’s salary/TDS records and Form 16. Whether it can be treated as a current-year salary adjustment depends on the facts and payroll treatment.
- If it was already included in taxable salary and tax was paid for FY 2024–25, examine a correction/revised return or other available relief for that year, subject to the applicable return-revision and rectification provisions and timelines. Do not claim a deduction in the current return without support.
- If the ₹2,00,000 was not actually recovered, or was an advance/loan rather than salary, the tax treatment may differ. Reconcile the payslips, Form 16, AIS/26AS and recovery records before filing.
A clear reconciliation of the original salary, TDS and subsequent recovery is essential for the payroll and return workflow. Manual adjustments across two financial years can be difficult; automation reduces repetitive checking while professional judgment remains in control. At Jir AI we provide 2,000+ AI agents and 650+ integrations to streamline your practice’s day-to-day workload. For a practical discussion on improving this workflow, connect with us on WhatsApp: https://wa.me/message/3HVOZ7HIY4ESC1