What are the subjects for which we could place complete reliance on Practice manual alone ( I mean Practice manual reading is enough) for getting decent marks- say 55+ ?
More importantly, will this work with law ?
Menu
Sufficiency of practice manual
Replies (12)
No subject @ Ca final level we can rely wholly on pm.
U can expect upto 40- 45 marks in isca, sfm & audit PMS, but not entire 200 marks to pass exams. For DT, idt u have to consider latest rtp mtp and supplementary study materials which all together can fetch up to 20- 25 marks.
Law companies act 13 has been introduced new section questions are to come in law & more over amendments are in the process so no chance of entirety depending on pm's
You need refer all new study material plus rtps
All Practical subjects. MUST DO from PM apart from your classes.
Co-link your classes Textbooks with PM. Do additional PM sums not covered in classes. Helps ALOT.
While i accept PM is not enough, i must also say that around 60 marks came from PM + SA alone in this May 15 AMA exam.
Correct me if am wrong, PM caters the basic minimum requirement in atleast subjects like AMA, DT.
My specific question is whether PM is not sufficient to serve even the 50 threshold Purpose?
Look, practice manual means questions of last 5-6 attempts.
So, basically its for revision and not basic study.
Looks like you are convinced of its utility, but let me assure you that if you are looking to rely on scoring good marks by doing only previously asked questions of 2-3 years, then it's up to you.
What about the complier , which institute recently issued ?
Guys at any level in CA as far as i know
Its a distance education programme and hence SM+PM+RTP MOST IMPORTANT.
We cannot say depending on PM just by looking at May 2015 paper is good...if you do some thorough analysis of past 4 to 5year papers ,you will come to know that practice manual will not help even to score 40+ in most of the papers...
So to be on safer side do SM..PM..RTP..etc.,
Practice manual is a collection of good model in past exam chapter wise while for theory they address most popular questions. The focus of the C.A Institute is application oriented knowledge. Try to build on concept and PM is definitely the first choice for revision.
At marks level following the trend you can plan for 40%
Practice manual is a collection of good model in past exam chapter wise while for theory they address most popular questions. The focus of the C.A Institute is application oriented knowledge. Try to build on concept and PM is definitely the first choice for revision.
At marks level following the trend you can plan for 40%
Hi Ankur,
My bottomline is ...
PM does offer the necessary groundwork over which it we could build the expertise.
Just completed reading SEBI in corporate and allied laws. I used Jayaraman sir's book and PM. PM almost covers almost 95% of the L.Jayaraman sir's stuff. Infact it was more precise and covers some extra points in certain areas.
Eg: The limit of 50% on monetary asset shall not be applicable in case public offer through offer for sale.
Recent Topics :
- Clarification on September 2026 PF Calculation for
- DRC-03 interest paid under CGST/SGST instead of IG
- GSTR1 amendment Bulk bills
- Capital Gain on Sale of Gold
- GST SALES RETURN MISSING 2025-26 FY
- Enquiry on FAST-DS system generated email
- Capital gain on sale of agriculture land
- Demand from TRACES
- FY 2025-26 ITC CLAIM DUE DATE
- 96084000 and 48202000 HSN code ka Tax Rate kya hai
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
