Some thing shocking news for practising ca

Others 2487 views 12 replies

In a very interesting move which may not be good news for Practising CA,CS,CMA Etc.,who are engaged in the area of law and taxation.Rajastha tax bar assosiation has filed a petition before cheif commisner of incometax (CCIT) and urget him to not to allow any one,else than advocates registered with the state bar councils to appear in any proceeding before assessing authorities as well as appellete authorities of incometax.

 

The bar council in its petition has refered madhras highcourt judgement in case of krishnammal vs balasubramania power

 

This may be major set back for chartered accountants after raise in limit for tax audits and bank audits

SOURCE: CA SANSAAR

 

Replies (12)

Please download attached file for

 

Above said case,

 

KRISHNAMMAL VS T BALA SUBRAMANIAN

Note :  This is official judgement copy which is download from court sit, judgement date is 21 april 1937

 

source ca sansar news:

Do you thing advocates can replace CA's?

 

Can they handle issues better than CA's?

 

Share your opinion on this,...

 

post your comments here.............

 

in which section of income tax it is given and whether law is amended 

 

Originally posted by : bittu

in which section of income tax it is given and whether law is amended 

 

It was clearly mentioned in my first post friend,

A petition was filed in rajasthan tax bar association

 

Please find attached to download petition filed in rajasthan tax bar association

Well, Earlier Also CA Cant Practice in High and Supreme Court.

and in Tribunal, Very Less Number of CA were Practising.

Most of the CA Dont Go Beyond Appeal Against AO.

So, Its Not That Much Bad News.

But One Can Say, From Every Where, Scope Becoming Lower and Lower for CA's.

 

Section 288 of the Income Tax Act, 1966:

 (1) Any assessee who is entitled or required to attend before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal in connection with any proceeding under this Act otherwise than when required under section 131 to attend personally for examination on oath or affirmation, may, subject to the other provisions of this section, attend by an authorised representative.

3(2) For the purposes of this section, “authorised representative” means a person authorised by the assessee in writing to appear on his behalf, being—

           (i)  a person related to the assessee in any manner, or a person regularly employed by the assessee; or

          (ii)  any officer of a Scheduled Bank with which the assessee maintains a current account or has other regular dealings; or

         (iii)  any legal practitioner who is entitled to practise in any civil court in India; or

         (iv)  an accountant; or

          (v)  any person who has passed any accountancy examination recognised in this behalf by the Board4; or

         (vi)  any person who has acquired such educational qualifications as the Board may prescribe5 for this purpose; or

    6[(via)  any person who, before the coming into force of this Act in the Union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Goa, Daman and Diu, or Pondicherry, attended before an income-tax authority in the said territory on behalf of any assessee otherwise than in the capacity of an employee or relative of that assessee; or]

        (vii)  any other person who, immediately before the commencement of this Act, was an income-tax practitioner within the meaning of clause (iv) of sub-section (2) of section 61 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), and was actually practising as such.

Explanation.—In this section, “accountant” means a 7chartered accountant within the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949), and includes, in relation to any State, any person who by virtue of the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 2268 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), is entitled to be appointed to act as an auditor of companies registered in that State.

 

Summary of the above provisions: A chartered Accountant is authorised to act as a representative of the assessee before any Income Tax Authority or Appellate Tribunal (but not before any court or in the case of proceeding u/s 131)

 

And no court can give any judgement which is ultra vires the Act.

 

So Mr. Ganesh, I'm unable to figure out how can it have any effect to the practicing chartered accountants.

@ shrikant

Above said case judgement was released on 21st april 1937

and i am not aware of technical possibilities of this issue,

will see what will happen in this regard in future?

Originally posted by : Ganeshbabu

@ shrikant

Above said case judgement was released on 21st april 1937

and i am not aware of technical possibilities of this issue,

will see what will happen in this regard in future?

Okay, anyways thanks for sharingyes

thanks for sharing this,

is there any affect on icwa professionals also

Now, I am going to be lawyer.......................

That was outdated case before the income tax act 1961. Agree.with @ shrikant


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register