ACA Mcom
44 Points
Joined June 2009
Originally posted by : Mangesh |
 |
If pvt Ltd company send material to party on Freight To Pay basis, and at the month end issued credit note for the same. Is service tax applicable? If yes please provide me details |
 |
Hello Mangesh,
From the above query, it seems that a company is sending goods to a party and the party is paying freight to the goods transport agency. Hence it falls under seven conditions of the circular, and whoever pays the freight is liable to pay service tax.
Now, the company is issuing credit note for the same. This means that the party (customer) has acted as an agent and has got the related expenses reimbursed. In such case, the company is paying freight through his party and hence the company is liable for service tax.
Also, it needs to be clarified that under Rule 5 of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, there is a concept of "PURE AGENT" wherein if the party falls under any 4 conditions of PURE AGENT, then the reimbursement of expenses is not chargeable to service tax. Following is the literature of a Pure Agent : -
For the purposes of sub- rule (2), "pure agent" means a person who-
(a) enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of service to act as his pure agent to incur expenditure or costs in the course of providing taxable service;
(b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services so procured or provided as pure agent of the recipient of service;
(c) does not use such goods or services so procured; and
(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services.
Transportation Charges (GTA Service) paid by the agent may or may not be in the capacity of pure-agent. Where the actual amount paid to the GTA is claimed in the bill, supported by an evidence, would constitute is re-imbursement of expenses. But where the profit element is involved and no evidence is added, it is difficult to say that the amount has been incurred in the capacity of pure agent.
Conclusion:
If the customer(party) is an agent/ consignee agent (contractual agreement should be there) and is getting its expenses on freight/incidendal expenses reimbursed by providing actual bills paid to transportation agency, then he will be considered a PURE AGENT (above 4 conditions should be fulfilled), in such case, the party would not be liable to service tax on reimbursement of freight. But if such is not the case (the credit note received includes element of profit margin/commission etc), then such amount shall be chargeable to service tax.
Now the question who shall pay:
If the party is a pure agent, and it is a reimbursement of actual cost incurred, then company/principal is liable to pay service tax on freight cost and not the party. In case such cost is not reimbursed, then service tax shall be paid by the party (ST is payable by that person who pays the money).
Case Laws:
There is debate on such matter and in previous case laws, additional reimbursement was not charged to service tax but inclusion of such rule has made the matters more complex and hence the matter stands debatable and has to be considered depending on circumstances of each case.