banner_ad

Section 234e - provide some relief !

TDS / TCS 441 views 2 replies

Is the penalty under the name of "FEE" levied by IT department under section 234E justified ? The deductors are serving as tax collection points to government . If one looks at it generally, it is the government's payment, which the deductor is collecting and depositing to the government. Even after that in many bona fide cases, heavy penalties are being levied using the new system of TRACES ranging from period of 2012-13 to present.

Government should do something in this regard and a mechanism is needed to improve these situations where some remedy or hearing is available at Local TDS officer level.

Please share your views.

Replies (2)

Penalty under the name of "FEE" levied by IT department under section 234E is not justified that is why stay orders has been obtained and contitutional validity of leviying such fee under Income Tax Act has been questioned.

You have rightly ponted out that it is the government's payment, which the deductor is collecting and depositing to the government.

Deducting the correct amount and depositing in to the bank and filing returns and issuing form 16, much work is involved.


 

Originally posted by : SEETHARAMAN
Penalty under the name of "FEE" levied by IT department under section 234E is not justified that is why stay orders has been obtained and contitutional validity of leviying such fee under Income Tax Act has been questioned.

You have rightly ponted out that it is the government's payment, which the deductor is collecting and depositing to the government.

Deducting the correct amount and depositing in to the bank and filing returns and issuing form 16, much work is involved.


 

Thanks SEETHARAMAN for opening the discussion board.

I am aware of the litigations going on in the appeallates and tribunals regarding this matter.But everyone cannot afford litigation specially where the amount of penaly is not so high. Later on if it is declared constitutionally invalid, then what is the government going to do with the sum already deposited by the deductors in fear of department's notice. It shall be unjustice to cases where delays were due to bonafide reasons on the part of deductors.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
14 May 2026
ICSI Trainees for 21 Months and Semi-Qualified CS

CMNITY HIRE

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Sr. Financial Analyst - Consolidation

Search Synergy

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Accountant

ca kunjan

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Fundraising Expert

MentorsWorld Ventures Private Limited

Ahmedabad

Others

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 June 2026
Article

Rakhecha & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
27 May 2026
Audit Assitant

Virender K Gupta and Co

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details