Finace Manager
22 Points
Joined July 2008
STO 2009 CESTAT 513
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH AT AHMEDABAD
CCE Vapi
Vs
Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt. Ltd.
Date of Order: 27/01/2009
Order No. A/319/WZB/AHD/2009, Appeal No.ST/166/2008, Arising out of OIA No.KRS/196/VAPI/2008, dt.22.7.08 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals),Vapi
Coram:
Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, Member (Technical)
Represented By:
Shri Sameer Chitkara, SDR for the Appellant
None - for the Respondent
Headnotes
CENVAT Credit: Service tax on outward transport service can be paid out of the Cenvat credit of
service tax available in the credit of account.
CASE
[Per: Mr. B.S.V. Murthy] - The short issue involved in the present appeal is as to whether the service tax on outward transport service can be paid out of the Cenvat credit of service tax available in the credit of account of the other respondent. The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the procedure followed by the respondent in paving the service tax due on the output services by utilization of Cenvat credit is correct, in view of the decisions of the Tribunal in case of M/s Visaka Industries Ltd. 2007 (8) STR 231 (Tri-Mum.) = STO 2007 CESTAT 184 and M/s R.R.D. Tex Pvt. Ltd. 2007(8) STR 186 (Tri-Chennai.) = STO 2007 CESTAT 427 I find that both the decisions are applicable to the facts of the present case and in both the decisions, the Tribunal has held that the manufacturers are not hit by the definition of output service and they fall under the definition of the procedure of taxable service. It has also been held that the Goods Transport Services (GTA) is considered to be the output service where the person is liable for service tax.
2. In view of the fact that the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) are based on the
Tribunal’s decisions applicable to the facts of the case and Revenue's appeal is based on
the ground that these decisions have not been accepted by the Revenue and the appeals
have been filed. I find no merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue and accordingly dismiss
the same.
(Pronounced in Court)
CASE CITED :
(1) R.R.D. Tex Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Salem : STO 2007 CESTAT 427
(2) Commissioner of C. Ex., Nagpur v. Visaka Industries Ltd. : STO 2007 CESTAT 184