463 Points
Joined September 2019
Thanks for reference case study:
I went through that complete case study article. I couldn't find anywhere 194-1 @ 2%.
Please read it again. If you find it please share it here.
Note:1
It was held that where buses/vehicles were hired for fixed tenure and for its exclusive usage Sec. 194C and not Sec. 194-1 could be attracted.
Note:2
Where assessee State Transport Corporation was making payment on kilometer running basis without any responsibility for running cost, maintenance cost, driver cost etc. Said payment would fall within the ambit of Sec. 194C and not under definition of rent as defined in Sec. 194-1. "