employed
2574 Points
Posted on 03 February 2010
Dear Ishpul,
My opinion is that of a student and not that of an expert... Please wait for others' opinions also
But like i said, the person receiving guarantee should have ensured that the provisions of the companies act, MOA and AOA, are satisfied.... I am not sure under what provision of the companies act the guarantee is void, but it runs on the same principle as the Doctrine of Constructive Notice.
Banks normally do not place reliance on the Doctrine of Indoor management
They insist on certified copies of all necessary resolutions before giving any facilities... So i guess the bank had been sufficiently negligent...
397 and 398 are not my forte, so i wont comment anything on mismanagement and oppression....