@ Ahana And Ravi,
Who said that Ahana will be wasting 6months by not writing group 2 of IPCC??
It’s a wrong notion. As per regulations governing IPCC, a student can start article ship after clearing group1 and can write Final exam after expiry of 2.5yrs of article ship.
Suppose a student clears group 1 of IPCC by Aug’10(result date). He / she will be starting articles max. By September ’10. So from Sept’10, 2.5yrs expires in Feb’2013 and the final exam will be in May 2013. So there is no problem if group2 is not cleared. It can be written in Nov’10 but still Final exam will be as per schedule i.emay2013. If a candidate clears both groups in May’10 itself, well and good. There will be absolutely no wastage of months BUT he/she should clear group 1 in May’10. If that is not done, then only there will be wastage of 6months.
In my opinion, Ahana has taken right decision to write only group1 because of following reasons:-
1- Preparation is not good for group2. What she will do by sitting over there and debiting tension to her peace of mind?
2- Even if group2 is cleared with half baked knowledge. Who will compensate the trust which a society has on CA’s? CA ‘s are treated as an expert in society. Everyone thinks we are thinking server. How can that trust be achieved by doing half baked preparation? What is the use of simply passing or even getting a rank, when someone is not aware of basics and intricate matters?
3- If she is writing group2, there are chances that tension will affect her preparation of group1. Group1 is required to be cleared with good knowledge as said above.
Since Ahana has done a mistake this time, never mind but try not to repeat again. Prepare well for group1 and clear it with good knowledge. Be cheerful and write well.
A kind request to everyone, take above reasons in a professional attitude. Don’t think that I am pulling anyone down. Those reasons are some harsh facts but a reality. I am sorry, if anybody is hurt.
Best wishes to everyone for better performance in exams. Keep on learning…………