Medical Reimbursements

Tax queries 310 views 1 replies

As per the income tax circular No. 603, dated 6-6-1991 which says that,

 

"the value of the perquisite arising by way of payment or reimbursement by an employer of expenditure on medical treatment incurred by his employee on himself or on his spouse, children or parents, including the provision of free medical treatment or treatment at a concessional rate, will not be included in the taxable salary of the employee in the following cases:

     (i)   Where the medical treatment is availed at hospitals, clinics, etc., maintained by the employer;

    (ii)   Where the medical treatment is availed of at hospitals maintained by the Government or local authorities or hospitals approved for the purposes of the Central Government Health Scheme or Central Medical Scheme

  (iii)   Where the expenditure is on medical insurance premia;

   (iv)  Where the medical treatment is availed of from any doctor outside the institutions/schemes mentioned in (i) to (iii) above an expenditure of up to Rs. 10,000 in a year, in the aggregate; and

    (v)   Where the medical treatment is availed of in a hospital outside India and the expenditure is incurred for treatment (including on travel and stay abroad in connection with such treatment) as also on travel and stay abroad of one attendant, to the extent permitted by the RBI, subject to the condition that the amount qualifying for such tax exemption would not include expenditure incurred on travel in the case of employees whose gross total income, as computed under the Income-tax Act without considering the amount paid or reimbursed for expenditure in connection with medical treatment abroad, exceeds Rs. 1,00,000.”

 

Further, as per Proviso to section 17(2) which says: -

 

“1) Expense incurred or reimbursed by the employer for the medical treatment of the employee or his family (spouse and children, dependent - parents, brothers and sisters) in any of the following hospital is not chargeable to tax in the hands of the employee:

a)  Hospital maintained by the employer.

b)  Hospital maintained by the Government or Local Authority or any other hospital approved by Central Government

c)  Hospital approved by the Chief Commissioner having regard to the prescribed guidelines for treatment of the prescribed diseases.

2) Medical insurance premium paid or reimbursed by the employer is not chargeable to tax.”

 

According to the above 2 sources, I have understood following: -

 

  1. There is no bifurcation of expenses under income tax laws which are incurred during “Hospitalisation Vs. OPD/Non-Hospitalisation” and later on reimbursed by employer. Thus, both shall be treated at par for the purpose of availing tax exemption.
  2. "Proviso to section 17(2)" also uses the word "hospitals approved by Central Government" which means CGHS empaneled hospitals. Further, this clause 1(b) also doesn't talk about any prescribed disease which means "all the treatment be it hospitalized or OPD/Consulatation" carried out in these approved hospitals would be non-taxable.

 

Request you to please provide your inputs on whether my interpretation is correct or not?

Replies (1)

Hi Tushar! Your interpretation is largely on point and aligns well with the Income Tax provisions and circulars regarding medical reimbursement as a perquisite. Here's a detailed confirmation and some clarifications:


Your points and clarifications:

  1. No bifurcation between Hospitalisation vs OPD/Non-Hospitalisation expenses:

  • The Income Tax Act and Circular No. 603/1991 don’t specifically distinguish between hospitalisation and OPD expenses for exemption purposes.

  • The exemption depends primarily on where the treatment is availed and whether the hospital or institution is eligible under the prescribed categories.

  • So, both hospitalisation and OPD medical expenses reimbursed by employer at approved hospitals or schemes are non-taxable up to the prescribed limits.

  1. Hospitals approved by Central Government (CGHS Empaneled hospitals):

  • The proviso to Section 17(2) mentions hospitals maintained by the employer, government/local authorities, or any hospital approved by the Central Government.

  • This indeed includes CGHS empaneled hospitals and similar government-approved hospitals.

  • As per your understanding, all treatments — OPD or inpatient — conducted in such hospitals are exempt from being treated as a taxable perquisite.

  • The circular and proviso do not restrict exemption to any "prescribed disease" for this category, so your view that all treatments at approved hospitals are exempt is correct.


Additional points for completeness:

  • Medical insurance premium paid or reimbursed by employer is fully exempt, irrespective of the insurer or hospital.

  • If the treatment is availed at any other hospital (not employer/government/approved), the exemption limit of Rs. 10,000 per annum applies on medical expenses.

  • Medical treatment abroad reimbursement can be exempt subject to RBI guidelines and income limits.


Summary:

Treatment Location/Type Tax Treatment on Reimbursement by Employer
Employer-maintained hospital Fully exempt
Government/local authority hospital Fully exempt
CGHS or Central Govt approved hospital Fully exempt
Any other hospital (non-approved) Exempt up to Rs. 10,000 p.a.
Medical insurance premium Fully exempt
Medical treatment abroad Exempt subject to RBI limits and conditions

Conclusion:

Yes, your understanding that there is no bifurcation between hospitalization vs OPD treatments for exemption, provided the hospital is approved by Central Govt or CGHS is correct. Both types of expenses reimbursed at such approved institutions are non-taxable perquisites.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register