Chartered Accountant
1375 Points
Joined August 2012
Well, now coming to the issue of 'HOW MUCH TO TAX if 10(10D) is not available?'
It is true that where premium paid is exceeding 10% of sum assured, the entire proceeds would get taxed and that it seems unfair to tax something thats already been taxed. But, this is how I would do it:
Treat the whole thing as capital gain, by treating it as an investment. Anything that generates return may be termed as an investment right?
LOGIC:
Issue #1 - Whether it is a capital asset? It is one, because the definition of capital asset u/s 2(14) is an inclusive one. It includes "Any kind of property held by an assessee, whether or not connected with business or profession of the assessee." Hence you may even include an investment in LIC.
Issue #2 - Whether there is transfer? The definition of the term “transfer” includes extinguishment, and when a part of the policy matures and proceeds are paid to the policyholder, there is a partial extinguishment of the policy. There is, therefore, a transfer of a part of the capital asset.
Hence, the capital gain computation shall be:
Maturity proceeds of policy (eg. Rs.100)= sale consideration of investment.
Less: Premium paid (eg. Rs. 80)= Cost of acquisition of investment. --> You may even apply indexation on this depending on the life of policy.
Net Capital gain (on Rs. 20 only) -> taxable @ 20% (if indexed) or 10% (if not indexed)
Hence the key to interpreting the definition of capital asset is crucial.
If you dont do the above, you will end up paying tax on Rs. 100 in the instances where you dont have exemption u/s 10(10D).
Hope this helps.
Disclaimer: This is not a legal opinion.Some AOs may not agree with this treatment. Hence its always arguable. This treatment has not been disallowed in my case.