Less marks in audit. is it Intentional by ICAI?

Even I got 37 marks in audit while i expected 55 plus marks. I also think this was intentional. This is very wrong on part of the institute to intentionally deduct marks and put almost 90 percent of the students in the same marks range. My audit aper was too good this time. I had quoted all SA's , clauses, sections. Had they given 10 more marks i would have cleared both groups in aggregate. They play with students career. I request all of you to write a mail  to the president and examination secretary. I am personally going to do so. 

Originally posted by : Karan
	I asked my frnds and 8 out of 10 told that they got 35 marks in audit. How it can happen??   all over india to all students marks were deleberately deducted in audit and sfm papers. Even 1st ranker got 49 marks in audit I am also expecting 55+ marks in audit but got only 35 all students got allmost same marks.   i  got FR - 53 SFM 35 Audit - 35 Law - 56   Most of the students here on caclubindia also got 35 marks in audit.     i think its intentionally made by ICAI. whatever your marks may be they have awarded only 35.   revaluation se kuch help hogi kya? ya fir certified copies ke liye apply kare. Whats your opinion frnds? Can anybody imagine all student's papers were same that they got 35 marks in same subject all over india?

I was also expecting 50+ in both Audit and Law but got only 35 in Audit and 39 in Law

Even i suspect institute valuation is very faulty, intentional and misleading...my frnd is taking help of a psychiatrist after results....i think its high time  we unitedly take some action against institute and teach them a lesson for playing with our life....

I seriously  dont understand whats in their mind.....QUALITY????? F****.....pls see how much money disciplinary committee is minting from tax practitioners and icai talks abt quality.....F****