I want to ask one question regarding the law language. I am giving an example of a definition :-
Review :-
The right of review has been conferred by section 114 and order 47, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The section provides that any person considering himself aggrieved by a decree or order, may apply for a review of judgement , to the court which passed the decree or made the order on any of the grounds mentioned.
now my question is if I change the words as Any person (includes himself) so does it really change the meaning of the definition.
If I substitute these words ,what meaning it would constitute like :-
1. it means that aggrieved persons should include himself as well.
2. it means any person who is aggrieved , it can be himself or other than himself
Or otherwise there can be some other word which can be replaced against considering himself.
Law experts 
........ please reply this question. I am waiting for your answers ....... 
Regards
Renu
CAclubindia
