Law language

Dear Renu Ji,

I am not an expert of law but still i would like to answer & please let me allow ...your interpretation on this definiton of review is same,using different sentence structures won't change the meaning of this definition.

In my words i would say any person whether he is aggrieved party or not but on behalf of aggrieved party by decree means not satisfied with the court order can apply for review.

Regards

Ajay Pandey

Its a very simple language.  It says that "Any person considering himself"  whihc means that if a person is aggreived by a decree or order he can make an appeal.

You are getting confused by the wording any person considering himself which means to you that a person including himself. Its not like that.

Thanks ajay ....

These words seems correct ....

whether he is aggrieved party or not .... I can even use these words.  Really nice suggestion

@ Giridhar Sir ...,

Yes, you are right. Considering is a bit tough word for me to use in exams ...  and I can use include ( as it's most common word for me) and it's really changing the meaning. That's y I asked here ....so that I can use such words which are nt jst easy to remember + not even alter the meaning.

Originally posted by : *RENU SINGH *
	I want to ask one question regarding  the law language. I am giving an example of a definition  :- Review :- The right of review has been conferred by section 114 and order 47, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The section provides that any person considering himself aggrieved by a decree or order, may apply for a review of judgement , to the court which passed the decree or made the order on any of the grounds mentioned.  now my question is if I change the words as  Any person (includes himself) so does it really change the meaning of the definition.  If I substitute these words ,what meaning it would constitute  like  :- 1. it means that aggrieved persons should include himself as well. 2. it means any person who is aggrieved , it can be himself or other than himself    Or otherwise there can  be some other word which can be replaced against considering himself.    Law experts ........ please reply this question. I am waiting for your answers .......     Regards Renu

Every word in the law has its own meaning... You need to read the above lines together not in part...

It says if any person considering himself aggrieved with the order he may prefer appeal...

It is a inclusive statement which includes anyone who may consider himself aggrieved, it does not require to mention including himself however, it is not changing the meaning of the term.

 

Thanks a lot for relieving me Sir ... I was thinking that include word may not change the meaning ... But still I would go with Ajay's words for safe side