Dear friends, I am studying CPT law. In the book, for suppose, it has been mentioned that the term "Express contract" is defined in section 9 of the Indian contracts act 1872. But in the case of "Implied contracts" and "Quasi Contracts" there is no mention about the sections where these terms have been given in the original act. Not only in the context of these defintions, but repeatedly it is happening in other defintions too. For some defintions they are mentioning the acts and for some other they are not. Even i have searched for them in the original act too. But i was unable to trace them. so please clarify about from where these unmentioned defintions are taken.
Menu
Law doubt
Replies (1)
it may not have been defined in the act but could have been taken from other acts or dictionary itself...what you're reading is basic...but important...court's do the work of interpretation and they follow some rules...you'll learn in future...
Recent Topic
- What's the ONE thing about GSTR-2B / IMS reconcili
- Is GST Registration Mandatory for Freelancers in I
- ITR TO FILE
- Shift of Place of Business from one state to anoth
- Form 10E u/s. 89(1). Need clarification because Ex
- Long Term Capital Loss - Tata Capital unlisted sha
- Section 54F deduction - GST and Stamp Duty cost wh
- Professional Crossed 20 Laks in Dec 26 Failed to T
- F&O in ITR
- CA Final Self pace Module
Related Topics
CAclubindia
