Jk shah for finals ?

I personally suggest you to go for professionals, faculties of Professionals are comparatively better than J.K, as professionals are at it's initial stage they're doing their best to add value to d coaching..

Ohh..problm s teaching in theatre is sumthn wierd...i doubt I ll learn der..faculty yaa I ve heard its good...bt jk shah profs I knw since I ws der for ipcc...nd dey r all fyn overall..ne faults in jk u ve heard plz leme knw? Thnxx fo replying :)

I hope ders sum notification kinda thing u ll get dat I ve replied !!! :O :p

Hello karishma, first of all, you seem to have fed your mind wd wrong impression that professional z a theater, I guess from j.k. shah's full page ad.. lolz.. yeah, d lectures r conducted in pinky theater basement but d computer aided teaching makes it lot more comfortable to study on huge screen.. d prof. writes on tab and it appears on d screen.. it's vry much comfortable to study there.. d batch z nt at all congested, and for ur information, there r benches and nt recliner seats..:o I too did J.k. for my IPCC and no doubt it ws good enough to help me clear my IPCC, but in my view d syllabus contents of J.k. shah was as per exam point of view, and i dint like d teaching style of sm prof. and professional z best at clearing concepts, it wl take lil more to complete d syllabus bt your conceptual understanding wl b higher enough to clear ur xam n make u a good c.a. further, j.k. z nw not hvng gud prof. like vora sir, anuj sir.. if ur well adjusted wd teaching styles of tanna, prabhu, viraj, than you cn go ahead.. i ws mainly concerned wd faculties, and not sitting arrangement. i preferd rahul sir, prasad sr, t.n. manoharan, anuj sir lot mor dan j.k. profs... all d bst...