Intepretation of statutes

Others 2364 views 21 replies

Interpretation of statutes:-

Statutes mean an act passed by legislative body. So interpretation means explanation of the same. Interpretation of statutes is needed when language of law is not clear or has ambiguous meaning. These interpretations are done with the help of some rules. So these rules are explanatory and can’t override the statute.

Interpretation of statutes

Primary Rules

Secondary Rules

  1. Rule of literal construction
  1. Noscitur a sociis
  1. Rule of reasonable construction
  1. Expressio Unis Exclusio Alterious
  1. Rule of harmonious construction
  1. Contemporanea  Expositio
  1. Rule of beneficial construction

 

  1. Rule of exceptional circumstances

 

  1. Rule of Ejusdem  Generis

 

 

  1. Rule of Literal Construction: - Literal means taking the word’s meaning in grammar sense. This is first rule of interpretation. This rule applies when meaning is clear and has only one meaning.  Example: - “I am really disturbed. I said Just go”

In the above case you won’t argue with the personcrying and obviously leave silently, as it was order given to you.

 

  1. Rule of reasonable construction: - This is 2nd rule. The court explains that we should understand the intention of law, reason behind making that law. And if the meaning is absurd  then we should construct its meaning within  the ambit of rules of reasonable construction.

Let’s take the above example. If your friend is saying these words to you, your answer would be “tell me what happened …what’s the problem. I am not going anywhere”

This is called the rule of reasonable construction. Now you had not followed the real words but searched its real interpretation why this or that is happening. This rule won’t apply when meaning is clear and reasonable construction is absurd. Now suppose your friend is tired and tells you to go. Now if you ask to him/her what’s the problem …? You already know what would be answer ….devilwink

 

  1. Rule of harmonious construction :- This rule says when there are conflicts between two or more provisions of law, they should be followed in such way that maximum benefit can be obtained and no rule need to be violated in the process of following the other one.

Example: - Kids can play in the ground till 7 PM. Kids must be do homework before they go for playing. Now your interpretation will be kids can play any time before 7 PM, once they finished their homework.

But this rule can’t be followed when one rule is overriding the other provision. Suppose in above example if I say kids can do Homework at 8 PM only. And rest conditions are same. So it means kids can’t play before 8 pm (homework finishing time) but their playing time limits are up to 7 PM. So, Harmonious construction rule can’t be followed in the above case.

 

  1. Rule of Beneficial construction :- Also called as Heydon’s rule and mischief rule. This rule says when literal meaning can’t be followed , then interpretation should be done in such a way that it suppresses  the mischief and advance the remedy.

Now suppose your teacher is fed up with teaching you the basic concepts of Accounts. And after 1 hour he gets so pissed off angry that he says to you “Go to hell…only there you can learn the real meaning of accounting concepts by yourself”devil

 

Ab sachi me thodi na koi hell me acha sa teacher baitha hai wink…jo sab kuch learn kara dega. So real meaning of the sentence is go and practice by yourself. And with more and more practice you’ll perfect. The law says the same thing. We should craft the real meaning/intention which can be apart from dictionary meaning.

 

Replies (21)
  1. Rule of exceptional Construction :-  it can be read in following ways ;-
    1. Common sense rule :-  almost similar like "Rule of reasonable construction"
    2.  And/ or :- And is used as conjunctive which means both provisions should be followed. Or implies the choice between the provision.
    3. May:- may is used in directory provisions normally e.g. may I come in ?
      1. May can be used Mandatory force when some obligation is there. E.g. in court lawyer says “objection My lord”

Judge says “Objection granted”

You may proceed.yes

  1. Shall is normally used for mandatory force but it’s used as directory force against :-
    1. The govt.
    2. Legislature demands
    3. Mandatory interpretation gives absurd meanings.
  2. For judging a provision is mandatory/directory we need to see the whole content matter.
  1. Rule of Ejusdem generis :- this rule says when law uses some specific words which belongs to same class. Then we  don’t need to find the meaning of every word. We can make the meaning of sentence as a whole.

Example: - Suppose you had assigned someone some work and describes him/her as “ Stupid, Idiot, fool, nonsense….etc etc etc…. now you can easily interpret the meaning of etc… and you can easily say that the person has not done the work in a good manner and know nothing about the work.Your friend didn’t described you that the person has not done the work but stillyou derived the same meaning with the help of such special words.

 

Regards

Renu

 

Nicely Explained....But Statute se majak nahi.....

Originally posted by : CMA. CS. Sanjay Gupta

Nicely Explained....But Statute se majak nahi.....


wo bhaiya pad pad ke thoda bore ho gaye na .... to maine socha thoda sa different try karte h ...is baar cool

Nicely Explain Dear...........................  

and examples u r given  to explain dis is also interesting..................

 

Keep sharing............. nd appreciating ur efforts....................

 

Hey Renu ! That's a very creative way to learn seemingly drab stuff ! Keep going on...cheeky

 

 in short
Noscitur a sociis-When a word is ambiguous, its meaning may be determined by reference to the rest of the statute
 
 
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius--"the express mention of one thing excludes all others"): Items not on the list are assumed not to be covered by the statute
 
 
expressio unius exclusio alterius--  The words of a statute must be construed as they would have been the day after the statute was passed
 
but nice shre

Good gaining,  Keep sharing..............

Well Explained Renu.......Keep it up...GOD BLESS YOU.

Thank you   @ P$...

You shared these 3 rules in  a line with so much ease .... angel

  

Thanks Renu..!! You made the topic interesting for those who leave this chapter in CS- Executive as well as in CA- Final.

Originally posted by : *RENU SINGH *




Originally posted by : CMA. CS. Sanjay Gupta






Nicely Explained....But Statute se majak nahi.....







wo bhaiya pad pad ke thoda bore ho gaye na .... to maine socha thoda sa different try karte h ...is baar


thoda sa diff ki thoda sa TOFFANI KARTE HAI  haha
 

nice 1 renu yes

Good sharing dear sis....

Noscitur a sociis-The meaning of questionable words or phrases in a statute may be ascertained by reference to the meaning of words or phrases associated with it.

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The expression of one thing is the exclusion of another.

Contemporanea expositio — that the meaning of words in an enactment will be understood in the sense which they bore when the enactment was passed."


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register