Indirect tax

240 views
User Avatar

41 Points Posted on 24 September 2020
Do we really need to refer the judicial updates of previous attempts like
Nov 18
May 19
Nov 19
May 20

for Nov 2020 upcoming exams..because hardly questions comes from the previous attempts judicial updates.
Please guide?
Is referring those above attempts judicial updates is a time waste or time investment?
0 Reply Share Follow
On 24 September 2020 at 19:19 Report
Replies (2)
Quick Summary
This discussion explores whether candidates need to review judicial updates from previous indirect tax exam attempts (Nov '18-May '20) for upcoming exams. The consensus suggests focusing on current updates and conceptual clarity, as questions from older updates are rare. It's advised that reviewing past updates might be a time-wasting exercise compared to revising current material.

User Avatar

257 Points Posted on 28 September 2020
No need, yes time waste, do number of revision from current source.. conceptual clarity is must
1 Reply
On 28 September 2020 at 14:24
User Avatar

41 Points Posted on 28 September 2020
Okay!
Thank you so much
Reply
On 28 September 2020 at 14:26

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Recent Topics :

  1. Looking for a study buddy intermediately Jan 2027
  2. How to correct a NIL GST return filed by mistake w
  3. Is it legally permissible not to report F&O lo
  4. Query on FCTRS
  5. APPLICABILITY AND BREAKDOWN OF GST COMPLIANCE ON S
  6. Advance for supply of goods
  7. Question for members: how do you manage client doc
  8. Clarification Required on Invoicing and Receipt of
  9. SEBI Registered VS NSDL Registered RTA
  10. Income tax or capital gain tax for Resident Indivi

More recent discussions | Post

Related Topics :

Loading