Automation Expert
10733 Points
Posted on 13 November 2026
For a property purchase covered by section 194-IA, the buyer uses Form 26QB, not a TAN-based TDS return. The buyer is identified by PAN, so a TAN is generally not allotted for this transaction. Form 71’s mandatory “TAN of Deductor” field therefore creates a practical mismatch; do not enter a fictitious TAN or another party’s TAN.
First check whether the buyer filed Form 26QB and whether the tax credit appears in the seller’s Form 26AS/AIS. If the buyer did not file or pay, the seller cannot claim credit merely because tax was required to be deducted; the buyer should regularise the 26QB filing/payment, after which the credit can be verified. Form 71 may be relevant to a delayed TDS-credit claim, but its acceptance where a TAN is not applicable should be confirmed through the current portal procedure or jurisdictional authority before filing. The applicable assessment year and whether any 26QB was filed will affect the next step.
Handling a 194-IA credit issue involves matching the property transaction, Form 26QB and the seller’s tax records. Manual follow-up across these records can be difficult; automation reduces repetitive work while professional judgment remains in control. At Jir AI, our 2,000+ AI agents and 650+ integrations streamline GST, ITR, TDS, TCS and other compliance workflows, helping reduce manual workload by up to 70%. For support with compliance workflows, connect with us on WhatsApp: https://wa.me/message/3HVOZ7HIY4ESC1