Income tax act section 194a(3)(ix)

2706 views 2 replies

Section 194A (3) (ix) of the Income Tax Act 1961 provides for deduction of tax at source only if the interest income of the claimant paid or credited during the financial year on compensation granted by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal exceeds Rs.50,000/-.  The question is whether the interest paid or credited during financial year means interest accrued till the date of payment or is it required to be bifurcated as per year of accrual for each claimant.  Say e.g. Claim filed in 2005 is allowed in 2015 with interest.  Whether the TDS provisions would apply for aggregate interest from 2005 till 2015 exceeding Rs.50,000/- per claimant or the interest per year has to exceed Rs.50,000/- for deductibility under said provisions?? There are conflicting judgments of ITAT as well as various High Courts and unfortunately no authoritative pronouncement of Apex Court is found.  Can anybody throw light on the subject??

Replies (2)

Sir, As per TDS provisions u/s.194A(3)(xi), Interest credited or paid by Motor Accident Claims tribunal if exceeds Rs.50,000 liable to deduct TDS on CREDIT or PAYMENT of Claim along with interest. The term CREDITED has more relevance to decide whether TDS to be deducted or not. In your case even though claimant lodged claim in 2005, it is CONFORMED by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in year 2015. The time lag is due to investigation carried out by such tribunal to find out the facts and circumstances of case.Once investigation completed, claim will be conformed. Unless tribunal conformed claim, Tribunal can not credit claimant for Claim and Interest amount in its books. so in your case Tribunal credited Claimant account in year 2015 and payment will be made after credit. so as per TDS provisions you have to consider actual credit entry in books. In your case as credit entry is passed in books in 2015, if such credit entry passed exceeds Rs.50000, liable to deduct TDS u/s.194A in year 2015. In TDS provisions you have to consider CREDIT (DUE) or PAYMENT but not ACCRUAL.   Furthur to support above, Claimant have no right for claim unless Tribunal conforms claim and unless Tribunal conforms claim he, need not to show in his Return above income under the head Income from other sources. 

Thanks for update. I also made some search on the subject and found provision in Section 145(b) of I.T. Act inserted from 01/04/2010 which makes the position clear.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

ANV & Company

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details