Practicing
1344 Points
Joined September 2012
Sir If it is Observed in CA Final Law Paper. Sylbs Mentions Allied Laws at 30 Marks Sylbs.
Now If you carefully see the Paper for Last 5 Attempts Even Incl this Paper. The Coverage is Either 22 marks or 38 Marks for Allied Laws. See How.
7 Ques Total Que 1 Compl & any 5 from 2 - 7
Allied Laws Coverage is 5 -6 Marks in Que No 1, In Que 3- 8 Marks, In Que 5 - 8 Marks & Question no 7 -16 Marks.
Considering that Q 1 is attempted as it is compulsary
Now if the Student leaves Quest No 7 as Optional he gets an attempt of only 21 -22 marks of Allied Laws.
Student leaves any one of Quest 2 or Quest 4 as Option, Then he Gets 37 - 38 Marks at Allied Laws
Only One condition that 30 Marks of Allied Laws gets covered is a Student leaving either Q 3 or 5 as Option then only the Sylbs of 30 Marks gets Covered.
The Moot point is that How can ICAI have such a disproportianate Distribution of Marks in the Paper compared to the Marks weightage Declared in the Sylbs.
If We consider that Q 1 -3 - 5 - 7 with any two from 2/4/6 are attempted student gets to attempt 62 of Corporate Law & 38 or Allied Laws.
Student Attempts Q 1 - 6 then he Gets 78 of Co Law & 22 of Allied Laws
ICAi is by itself Violating its Own declaration & Publication of the Marks covered & Distributed in the Sylbs.
ICAI is Cheating the Students by telling something & Giving something which is very different from which it has declared in Writing.
Lets take this Matter too with ICAI.
If this Matter is Taken ICAI will have to Allot 8 more Marks to every student this Time for this Disproportianate seggregation of Marks