Foreign audit firms may get full practising rights

Stat Audit 843 views 1 replies

May, 31st 2010

Foreign audit firms may soon get full practising rights in India. Recommendations to give them full rights and make them accountable are in the final report on the multi-crore Satyam Computers scam submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to the ministry of corporate affairs.

The ministry of corporate affairs, the ministry of commerce and the Reserve Bank of India are examining the ICAI recommendations, minister of corporate affairs Salman Khurshid told Financial Chronicle in an interview.

“ICAI has given us a report on how foreign firms should be brought under the purview of ICAI. They should first be allowed to practise so that they can be made liable. So, we have to work out a system. Discussions are under way. We are talking to the commerce ministry and the RBI on the level of permission that can be given to the foreign firms,” said Khurshid.

Advocating full rights to foreign audit firms, Khurshid said, “If you have to make them liable for negligent practices, you have to first allow them to practise. You can’t have both ways where you prevent them from practising and say that you can be punished. So the whole picture has to be sorted out. We are looking at it.”

A senior ICAI member said the whole idea was to hold someone responsible and bring the right person to book in case of any wrongdoing.

“When the Satyam accounting fraud broke out, the general perception was that PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) India was the auditor. But on paper it was Pricewaterhouse Hyderabad or Lovelock & Lewis, which is the Indian associate of Pricewaterhouse and interestingly there was overlapping of partnership.

There are individuals who are partners of both PwC India and Lovelock & Lewis. This unnecessarily creates a lot of confusion. Such complications should be done away with," the member said.

At present, foreign firms such as Deloitte, Ernst & Young, PwC, and KPMG have tie-ups with domestic accounting firms. The Indian affiliates of PricewaterhouseCoopers include Pricewaterhouse firms and Lovelock & Lewis, while Deloitte has tie-ups with C C Chokshi, A F Ferguson, Fraser & Ross and S B Billimoria. Similarly, KPMG has a tie-up with BSR, and Ernst & Young has a tie-up with S R Batliboi.

Under the existing World Trade Organisation agreement, India has no obligation to open its market to foreign audit firms. However, in the Doha Rounds, India can agree to open its market to its trade partners.

The role of global audit firms came under scrutiny when two partners of Satyam’s auditor Pricewaterhouse were arrested.

A partner and director of one of the Big Four firms told Financial Chronicle, "I have heard of such a move. In fact, this is a very progressive move. Often some negative perception is being created unnecessarily against Big Four firms. This would also create a level-playing field among audit firms.

Those who cannot use the parent company's name while auditing will now be able to use that name. Having said that, I must add that there has to be a rider: partners of the parent firm or the parent firm should not be held responsible for any wrongdoings at the Indian operations’ end. The Indian outfits are accountable anyways.

Replies (1)

May, 26th 2010

The CA Institute's second and final report on the Satyam scam and the role of the company's statutory auditor in that accounting fraud was submitted to the Corporate Affairs Ministry on Monday.

The Central Council had, recently, approved the second report, sources in the CA institute said. The ICAI's High Powered Committee, set up at the Government's behest soon after the Satyam scam came to light had submitted its first report to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on July 17 last year. 

Meanwhile, the ICAI is likely to make recommendations in the coming weeks to the Government for further amendments to the CA regulations. Indications are that the audit profession regulator would recommend changes in regulations to empower the CA institute to punish not only the concerned audit partner, but also the audit firm in situations of audit or accounting frauds.

Under the current regulations, the CA institute or its disciplinary committee cannot take penal action against any audit firm for involvement of a partner in any accounting fraud.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register