Audit Manager
22 Points
Joined January 2017
"IN RELATION" HAS NOT BEEN DEFINED IN GST ACT. "IN RELATION" IS, IN COMMON PARLANCE , USED FOR "IN CONNECTION WITH" THAT IS WIDER TERM AND THEREFORE IT WILL NOT ONLY COVER MOTOR VEHICLE BUT OTHER SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE ALSO. THUS EVEN ITC ON CAR INSURANCE AS A SERVICE IN CONNECTION WITH CAR WILL ALSO BE DISALLOWED U/S 17(5).
ON THE OTHER HAND, WHEN ANYTHING ("IN RELATION OF") IS NOT SPECIFICALLY DEFINED, ONE MAY TAKE BENIFIT IN HIS/HER FAVOUR AS A TAX PAYER AND ONE MAY TAKE ITC ON CAR INSURANCE.
AS A TAXPAYER I WOULD GO FOR AVAILING THE CREDIT
MOTOR VEHICLE & OTHER CONVEYENCES:
1. PURCHASE - ITC NOT ALLOWED
2. REPAIR/INSURANCE/PARKING - ITC ALLOWED
3. HIRE OF CAR(4 WHEELER) - ITC NOT ALLOWED AS COVERED IN "RENT A CAB"
4. LEASE OF CAR - ITC NOT ALLOWED (SUBTANCE OF FINANCE LEASE IS AS IF PURCHASE CASE)
5. FUEL/ TOLL TAX - N/A AS NOT SUBJECT TO TAX