Cost accountant report helps to solve decade-old excise case

899 views 2 replies

MUMBAI: Fiat India has lost an almost decade-old battle with the excise department which had slapped a Rs 432 crore duty on the company for Uno cars sold below cost price between 1996 and 2001.

In a landmark judgment on August 29, Justice H L Dattu of the Supreme Court set aside the order passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and restored the order by the adjudicating authority.

The excise department had discovered that the company was importing car kits in completely knocked down (CKD) and semi-knocked down condition and the cost of production of a single car was Rs 3,80,883 (CKD) and Rs 3,98,585 (SKD), respectively, against the assessable value of Rs 1,85,400.

Fiat India officials did not comment on the order. However, a source said that the order pertained to a different Fiat company. The tax department's contention was that cars were imported at a higher price but were sold at loss for a consideration - to penetrate the market, a fact confirmed by the company.

Arguing the case, Bishwajit Bhattacharyya, Additional Solicitor General of India, said the price at which the goods were sold by Fiat India clearly indicated that these goods were not "ordinarily sold" in terms of Section 4 (1) (a) of the Central Excise Act as the company had sold the cars at 100% loss for five years. "This judgment will bring about clarity and certainty in valuation under the central excise laws," said Bhattacharyya.

The order will have wide implications as the tax department will now feel vindicated on its stand that the central excise duty is chargeable on manufacture or production of goods and not on the sale of goods.

In his order, Justice Dattu said the assessing authority could not calculate the valuation with the help of other rules and resorted to the "best judgment method" while taking the assistance of 'cost accountant', who was asked to conduct a special audit to ascertain the correct price. "Therefore, we cannot take exception of the assessable value of the excisable goods quantified by the assessing authority."

https://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-08-31/mumbai/33520893_1_fiat-india-excisable-goods-assessable-value

 

Replies (2)

The above judgement is based on erstwhile central excise valuation rules.  But now the valuation is based on transaction value. Thanks for sharing the information.

The Supreme Court  has dismissed the review petition filed by Fiat India Private Limited on the issue of valuation under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court, vide order dated November 27, 2012, observed that there was no reason to interfere with its original order dated August 29, 2012.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 June 2026
Article

Rakhecha & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
Featured 24 June 2026
HEAD - AUDIT AND TAXATION

A R JADHAV AND ASSOCIATES

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details