Cost accountant report helps to solve decade-old excise case

MUMBAI: Fiat India has lost an almost decade-old battle with the excise department which had slapped a Rs 432 crore duty on the company for Uno cars sold below cost price between 1996 and 2001.

In a landmark judgment on August 29, Justice H L Dattu of the Supreme Court set aside the order passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and restored the order by the adjudicating authority.

The excise department had discovered that the company was importing car kits in completely knocked down (CKD) and semi-knocked down condition and the cost of production of a single car was Rs 3,80,883 (CKD) and Rs 3,98,585 (SKD), respectively, against the assessable value of Rs 1,85,400.

Fiat India officials did not comment on the order. However, a source said that the order pertained to a different Fiat company. The tax department's contention was that cars were imported at a higher price but were sold at loss for a consideration - to penetrate the market, a fact confirmed by the company.

Arguing the case, Bishwajit Bhattacharyya, Additional Solicitor General of India, said the price at which the goods were sold by Fiat India clearly indicated that these goods were not "ordinarily sold" in terms of Section 4 (1) (a) of the Central Excise Act as the company had sold the cars at 100% loss for five years. "This judgment will bring about clarity and certainty in valuation under the central excise laws," said Bhattacharyya.

The order will have wide implications as the tax department will now feel vindicated on its stand that the central excise duty is chargeable on manufacture or production of goods and not on the sale of goods.

In his order, Justice Dattu said the assessing authority could not calculate the valuation with the help of other rules and resorted to the "best judgment method" while taking the assistance of 'cost accountant', who was asked to conduct a special audit to ascertain the correct price. "Therefore, we cannot take exception of the assessable value of the excisable goods quantified by the assessing authority."

https://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-08-31/mumbai/33520893_1_fiat-india-excisable-goods-assessable-value

 

Replies (2)

The above judgement is based on erstwhile central excise valuation rules.  But now the valuation is based on transaction value. Thanks for sharing the information.

The Supreme Court  has dismissed the review petition filed by Fiat India Private Limited on the issue of valuation under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court, vide order dated November 27, 2012, observed that there was no reason to interfere with its original order dated August 29, 2012.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Article Assistant

M/s.S.G.Salecha & Co.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

apricus india

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
28 August 2026
Assistant Manager

NRS AND ASSOCIATES

Kozhikode

CA Inter

View Details
Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Chartered Accountant Articles

Rohit KC Jain & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
Article Assistant

Jain Ankit and Co

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
CA Article Trainee

ASC Group

Noida

CA Inter

View Details