Can same income be taxed twice by Income Tax department ?

Tax queries 269 views 5 replies

Facts:

Sold ancestral land and divided the money equally between the 3 members of the HUF.

  • All 3 members of the HUF filed their tax returns; and paid long term capital gains for their share.
  • Income tax dept issued notice stating that the property is not acestal and that  the income is individual income and the entire amount should be taxed in the name of the karta of the HUF, in his individual capacity.
  • In the notice issued, while the entire income is being shown against karta of the HUF in his individual capacity along with the taxes paid on his name, BUT the taxes paid in the name of the rest of the two members of the HUF are not being accounted for in the notice.
  • Despite multiple representations income tax department is not putting he detail of all taxes paid for the captial gains received in the notice issued  to the karta of the HUF in his individual capacity.

Question:

Doesn't the above amount to  to taxing the same money twice ? If all the capital gains received have to be taxed against the Karta of the HUF in his individual capacity, then all the taxes already paid in the name of the rest of the two members of the HUF should also be taken into account.

While there are other aspects of the matter which are not mentioned here, looking for a CASE LAW for ' Same Income Cannot Be Taxed Twice'.

  • Please advise.
  • Kindly mention any famous well known Supreme court or high court of ITAT case law. 

 

Replies (5)
Sir for such type of issue either contact some CA personally or you can DM me.

Sure will do Rashmi mam. 

The best I have found until now is RAJESH GUPTA VS ITO - ITAT - DELHI - 2020. Attached is the ITAT order.

Please share if there is a better order, case law from ITAT or high court or Supreme court.

There are others .
@ sabyasachi mukherjee, So what you want??? Reply to your rubbish post

Though the details need to be seen and as others told, you need to consult a CA in this regard. But following if followed/ complied, might help to establish your point:

1) property was in the name of the HUF, if not a declaration thereto by the Karta that the same was held by him on behalf of HUF

2) HUF has its separate PAN and your are being filing the return in its name and the property was shown in its return (if applicable)

3) Later there was partial partition of HUF by which you all received your respective share.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register