Ca final may 14 ama query

This is regarding the LP question asked (Refer Q. No. 3(b)) of the question paper, refer attachment). Suppose we calculate the hours required to produce 30 units of product X(3) (which comes to 180 hrs. and 120 hrs. for machining and assembly respectively), and reduce the minimum available hours for the remaining two products for each deptt. In such a case, we are able to formulate an LPP in two variables only (for products X(1) and X(2)). The solution becomes simpler, as otherwise, a third constraint i.e. x(3) = 30 will have to be added. Will such an approach be considered correct in the exam?

/editor_upload/961026175untitled.png

 

Replies (2)
Its perfect,not to worry,it was a six mark question

yup! in fact i did the same in the exams!

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
15 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Continental Belting Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Finance

I-Genext Consulting Private Limited

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
24 October 2026
CA Industrial Trainee

Fytomax Nutrition Private Limited

Aurangabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 October 2026
CA article trainee

Zerdi & Co. Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 22 October 2026
Articleship intern

Srinath Manikanta

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details