Save Rs 499 on a 2-Year Ad-Free CAclubindia Pro Membership. Subscribe Now!

3CD CLAUSE 16D

212 views

Save Share

HARSHA BHAT

180 Points Posted on 17 July 2022

one of my client recieved demand order since he declared income from house property in clause 16d. as a result cpc has added same income again under pgbp and raised a demand intimation 143(1)..... what's the wayout

Replies (6)

Quick Summary

A user's client received a demand order from CPC after declaring income under 3CD Clause 16D. CPC incorrectly added this income again under PGBP, leading to a 143(1) intimation. The issue stems from a data entry mistake where income from house property (IFHP) was reported but also included under Clause 16D, stating it wasn't business income. CPC then processed it twice. The user is seeking a way to rectify this, as the standard rectification request isn't allowing a re-filing.

CA Rashmi Gandhi

Chartered Accountant

86505 Points Posted on 17 July 2022

For that need to view intimation , mail me at rash.0903 @ gmail.com

HARSHA BHAT

180 Points Posted on 23 July 2022

Hello madam sent you document via mail

CA Rashmi Gandhi

Chartered Accountant

86505 Points Posted on 23 July 2022

There was some data entry mistake same can be checked from ITR form

HARSHA BHAT

180 Points Posted on 23 July 2022

Actually income house property is reported under IFHP but again same has been reported in clause D stating that IFHP income isn't considered under business income. but cpc while processing the return has added it twice under both heads and raised the demand. so now iam looking for the wayout to rectify. but rectification request seems not allowing to file the return again