Court :
CESTAT (New Delhi)
Brief :
The Hon’ble CESTAT, New Delhi relying upon the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana Vs. Sangrur Agro Ltd. [2010 (2) TMI 438 – PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT] dealing with reversal of amount under Section 6(3)(b) of the Credit Rules, held that since there was no suppression of facts i.e. element of Section 11AC of the Excise Act is not present, said provisions are not applicable and consequently, penalty under Rule 15 of the Credit Rules is also not imposable.
Citation :
Man Structural Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. & S.T. Jaipur-I [2015 (11) TMI 664
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English