Upheld the provisions w.r.t claiming of refund of unutilized ITC

Last updated: 28 January 2022
Quick Summary
The Rajasthan High Court has upheld the validity of Section 54 of the CGST Act, which governs the claiming of refunds for unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court directed the tax department to issue a final order on the petitioner's refund claim, considering their submitted reply. This ruling follows a Supreme Court decision that also affirmed the constitutionality of Section 54.

Court :
Rajasthan High Court

Brief :
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in M/S Triveny Electrodes & ors. v. Union of India, Through Secretary, Finance Department, Government of India, New Delhi & ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2137/2022 dated January 20, 2022] upheld the provisions w.r.t claiming of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit ("ITC") and asked the department to pass final order after taking into account the reply of the assessee.

Citation :
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2137/2022 dated January 20, 2022

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 240
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  3. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  4. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  5. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  6. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  7. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  8. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  9. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  10. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member swaminathanswaminathanPro Member Jayanti VisaniJayanti VisaniPro Member A.S.SUNDARARAJANA.S.SUNDARARAJANPro Member Pritanu ChakrabortyPritanu ChakrabortyPro Member Milton MorasMilton Moras
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category