Treatment of consideration received for sale of software as 'royalty'

Last updated: 22 July 2021
Quick Summary
This case concerns whether income received by Autodesk Asia Pte Limited from selling software licenses and associated hardware to Indian customers should be classified as royalty. The Assessing Officer, following directions from the DRP, treated this income as royalty. However, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal referred to a Supreme Court judgment in a similar case, Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax, which may provide clarity on this matter.

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
 This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Assessing Officer dated 28.11.2017 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act].

Citation :
IT(IT)A No.3234/Bang/2018

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 227
downloaded 296 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  2. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  3. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  4. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  5. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  6. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal
  7. Scope of Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is Confined to Errors Apparent on the Face of Record
  8. Appellate Authority has no power to condone delay in filing appeal beyond the outer limit prescribed under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act
  9. CESTAT New Delhi: Sub-Contractor Separately Liable for Service Tax Regardless of Main Contractor's Discharge
  10. Cenvat Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely on Third-Party Statements Without Corroborative Evidence

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member GOVIND VAJIRAJ DESAIGOVIND VAJIRAJ DESAIPro Member Bhavesh MargiBhavesh MargiPro Member TitusTitusPro Member AMAR MEHARWADEAMAR MEHARWADEPro Member John Ravindran MosesJohn Ravindran Moses
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details
Company
16 September 2026
Internal Audit - Team Lead

Consulting & Beyond

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Article Assistant

SGNG & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
Article Assistant

ANIVESH CONSULTANTS LLP

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Semi-Qualified Assitant

Subrahmanyam & Sivudu CA Firm

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 21 September 2026
CA Article Assistant

KK & Company Chartered Accountant

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
18 September 2026
Accounts & Finance Specialist

ULTRA CHEMICAL WORKS

Thane

CA Final

View Details