Sonesh Dedhia has preferred to settle the pending disputes under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020”

Last updated: 22 January 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by Sonesh Dedhia. This decision was made after the assessee indicated their intention to settle pending direct tax disputes under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. The dismissal is without prejudice, allowing the assessee to seek a recall of the appeal if the scheme declaration is not filed or accepted.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
At the time of hearing of captioned appeal, none appeared forassessee. However, vide assessee’s counsel letter as placed on record, it transpires that the assessee is opting to settle the disputeunder Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020.Accordingly, the bench deems it fit to dismiss the appeal with a liberty to assessee to seek recall of the appeal in case the requisitedeclaration under the scheme is not filed or in case the declaration under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons. 

Citation :
I.T.A. No.2069/Mum/2018

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 144
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  3. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  4. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  5. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  6. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  7. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  8. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  9. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  10. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member VIJAY M DHANAKVIJAY M DHANAKPro Member Sanjay RatnaniSanjay RatnaniPro Member RISHI LATTARISHI LATTAPro Member shubham agrawalshubham agrawalPro Member svgovindarajusvgovindaraju
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category