Rule 19(2) is applicable in the case where appellant is not interested in the proseqution


Last updated: 21 May 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
Despite sending notice of hearing sufficiently in advance, assessee did not appear nor any application for adjournment has been received at the time of hearing of the appeal, in spite of the fact that earlier also on 23.3.2011 and 10.8.2011, the appeal was adjourned due to various reasons including at the request of the assessee itself. Thus, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of the present appeal

Citation :
M/s Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaja Memorial National Committee, Chatrapti Sivaji Bhawan, B-14/A, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi.110 016. (PAN/GIR No.AAFT3397H) (Appellant) Vs. ITO (E), Trust Ward 1, New Delhi (Respondent)

You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :

GST Plus

Stay updated! Stay ads free

Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.

CCI PRO annual subscription :

Original Price : INR 2999/-

Offer Price : INR 1999/-

Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)


Know More

Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
 

CCI Pro

CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1174
Share Report Abuse
Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link

Other Latest Judgments

View More Judgments »


CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Subscribe Now

Trending Online Classes

view all classess

Follow us

Browse by Category