Relief to JRD Tata Trust - ITAT upholds its Tax - Exempt Status


Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has upheld the tax-exempt status of the JRD Tata Trust for the assessment year 2014-15. The trust appealed an order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) which had initiated proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT's decision means the trust retains its tax-exempt status.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 29th March 2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) under section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the assessment year 2014-15.

Citation :
ITA No. 3738/Mum/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI F BENCH, MUMBAI

[Coram: Justice P P Bhatt (President) and
Pramod Kumar (Vice President)]

ITA No. 3738/Mum/2019
Assessment year: 2014-15

J R D Tata Trust ……………………….Appellant
Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody Street
Fort, Mumbai 400 001[PAN: AAATT0165F]

Vs

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Exemption Circle 2(1), Mumbai ……………………Respondent

Appearances by

P J Pardiwala, Sr Advocate, along-with Madhur Agarwal, Sukh Sagar Syal, 
T P Ostwal and Indira Anand for the appellant 
Rajesh Damor (CIT-DR) and Brijendra Kumar for the respondent

Date of concluding the hearing : December 11, 2020
Date of pronouncement of order : December 28, 2020

O R D E R

Per bench:

1. By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 29th March 2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) under section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the assessment year 2014-15.

2. Grievances raised by the appellant, which, being interconnected, will be taken up together, are as follows:

1. On the facts and under the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) [‘CIT(E)’] erred in initiating proceedings under section 263 of the Act against the Appellant

2. On the facts and under the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(E) erred in holding that the assessment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) — 2(1) (‘the learned Assessing Officer’) was erroneous as due verification was not undertaken by the learned Assessing Officer.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

FAQ :

The main issue was whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) had erred in initiating proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act and in holding that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was erroneous due to insufficient verification.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai made the final decision.

The assessment year under review was 2014-15.

The ITAT upheld the tax-exempt status of the JRD Tata Trust.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 139
downloaded 226 times

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 July 2026
Article

Gianender & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 July 2026
Articleship

Jawahar and Associates Chartered Accountants

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 July 2026
CA Articles

Kinjal H Shah & Co.

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 July 2026
Article internship

AJAY SINGH AND CO LLP

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
13 July 2026
AVP / VP - PCG Advisory

Workforce Connect

Mumbai

MBA

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT, CA SemiQualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Semi qualified CA

Garg Bros & Associate CA

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
Article Assistant

G A R U D & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Follow