Relief to JRD Tata Trust - ITAT upholds its Tax - Exempt Status


Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has upheld the tax-exempt status of the JRD Tata Trust for the assessment year 2014-15. The trust appealed an order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) which had initiated proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT's decision means the trust retains its tax-exempt status.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 29th March 2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) under section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the assessment year 2014-15.

Citation :
ITA No. 3738/Mum/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI F BENCH, MUMBAI

[Coram: Justice P P Bhatt (President) and
Pramod Kumar (Vice President)]

ITA No. 3738/Mum/2019
Assessment year: 2014-15

J R D Tata Trust ……………………….Appellant
Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody Street
Fort, Mumbai 400 001[PAN: AAATT0165F]

Vs

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Exemption Circle 2(1), Mumbai ……………………Respondent

Appearances by

P J Pardiwala, Sr Advocate, along-with Madhur Agarwal, Sukh Sagar Syal, 
T P Ostwal and Indira Anand for the appellant 
Rajesh Damor (CIT-DR) and Brijendra Kumar for the respondent

Date of concluding the hearing : December 11, 2020
Date of pronouncement of order : December 28, 2020

O R D E R

Per bench:

1. By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 29th March 2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) under section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the assessment year 2014-15.

2. Grievances raised by the appellant, which, being interconnected, will be taken up together, are as follows:

1. On the facts and under the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) [‘CIT(E)’] erred in initiating proceedings under section 263 of the Act against the Appellant

2. On the facts and under the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(E) erred in holding that the assessment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) — 2(1) (‘the learned Assessing Officer’) was erroneous as due verification was not undertaken by the learned Assessing Officer.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

FAQ :

The main issue was whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) had erred in initiating proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act and in holding that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was erroneous due to insufficient verification.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai made the final decision.

The assessment year under review was 2014-15.

The ITAT upheld the tax-exempt status of the JRD Tata Trust.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 147
downloaded 249 times

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
Article/ Paid Assistant

Murali and Sumeet Chartered Accountant

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA / CA Inter - 2 Groups Cleared

Getmyca Consultant Pvt Ltd

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Semi-Qualified Assitant

Subrahmanyam & Sivudu CA Firm

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
CA Article Assistant/CA Drop Out/Accounts Executive

PARV & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 21 September 2026
Consultant - Reporting

Finrep Advisors LLP

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
CA Articles

Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 August 2026
Article Assistant

RRPM & ASSOCIATES LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details