Court :
IN THE CESTAT, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI
Brief :
Refund - Unjust enrichment - Downward revision of price of goods with retrospective effect as per agreement between parties - Appellants returned differential price as well as differential duty by way of issuing credit notes to buyer - No infirmity in impugned order allowing refund claim in respect of excess duty paid at the time of original clearance of goods - Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. [para 2]
Citation :
2008 (232) E.L.T. 306 (Tri. - Chennai)
IN THE CESTAT, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI
Shri P.G. Chacko, Member (J)
COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MANGALORE
Versus
KELTECH ENERGIES LTD.
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
Judgement posted by
GST and Indirect Tax Adviser, Trainer
Hi all, Would be glad to help in the areas of my expertise that is GST and Indirect Taxation - compliance of procedures, legal opinions, litigation (drafting appeals, reply to notices), audit and management of Central Excise, Service Tax, Customs, EXIM Policy, VAT, CST and GST going forward etc. Always put origin ... Read more
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English