Court :
Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi
Brief :
The Appellant filed an appeal before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi. The Hon’ble Tribunal vide a non-speaking Order dated February 26, 2013 (“Impugned Order”) ordered pre-deposit of 40% of the demand under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to the Finance Act, 1994 (“the Finance Act”) vide Section 83 thereof. Later vide Order dated April 11, 2013, the Hon’ble Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant for non-compliance of condition of pre-deposit. Being aggrieved, the Appellant filed an appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad.
Citation :
Shukla & Brothers Vs. Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal [(2015)
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
SMJ global advisors pvt ltd
New Delhi
B.Com
View Details
Vardhaman Group of India
Pimpri Chinchwad
CA Inter
View Details
Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
T R SOOD & CO
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
