Practising advocates should not have to face harassment on account of payment of GST

Last updated: 09 August 2021

Court :
Orissa High Court

Brief :
It is admitted that no notice in the first instance ought to have been issued to the Petitioner, who is a practising advocate. The Commissioner GST is directed to issue clear instructions to all the officers in the GST Commissionerates in Odisha that no notice demanding payment of service tax/GST will be issued to lawyers rendering legal services and falling in the negative list, as far as the GST regime is concerned.

Citation :
Devi Prasad Tripathy v. Principal Commissioner CGST & Central Excise, Bhubaneswar [2021] 128 taxmann.com 413 (Orissa)

You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :

Stay updated! Stay ads free

Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.

CCI PRO annual subscription :

Original Price : INR 2999/-

Offer Price : INR 1999/-

Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)

Know More

Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok

ANJANA MURALEEDHARAN

Published in GST
Views : 161

Share Report Abuse

Comments

Practising advocates should not have to face harassment on account of payment of GST

You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :