Court :
Bombay High Court
Brief :
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Hikal Limited v. Union of India and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 78 OF 2025, order dated September 11, 2025] held that the omission of Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017 without any savings clause to protect pending proceedings results in 'such pending proceedings lapsing' and no longer being sustainable, as the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act do not apply to repeals or omissions caused by subordinate legislation such as Rules.
Citation :
Writ Petition No. 78 OF 2025, order dated September 11, 2025
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
Judgement posted by
Service
FCA, FCS LLB with21 Yrs of Experience inTaxation Indirect and Direct: Education Qualification: B.Com (Hons) Chartered Accountants Company Secretary LLB Qualified SAP FI/CO Consultants Professional Membership: Chairmanof Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce Member of Indirec ... Read more
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English