Non-mention in order does not mean that submission not considered


Last updated: 27 November 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
In the present application, the assessee has contended that in the aforesaid order, a typographical mistake has crept in inasmuch as in para 10 of our said order, we have wrongly extracted the portion of para 3 of the CIT (A)’s order, taking it to be the submissions of the assessee before the Ld. CIT (A); that the said extracted portion of the CIT (A)’s order is, in fact, not the submissions of the assessee before the CIT (A), but the operative portion of the CIT (A)’s order, whereas the submissions of the assessee before the CIT (A) are contained in para 2.7 at page 3 of the CIT (A)’s order. This para 2.7 of the CIT (A)’s order has been reproduced in para 3 of the application. The ld. counsel for the assessee, before us, has reiterated the contents of the application

Citation :
Shri Kaushal Sethi, DU-18, Pitampura, Delhi. (Applicant) Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25 (1),New Delhi. (Respondent)

You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :

GST Plus

Stay updated! Stay ads free

Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.

CCI PRO annual subscription :

Original Price : INR 2999/-

Offer Price : INR 1999/-

Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)


Know More

Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
 

CCI Pro

CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 3376

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members


Follow us