Court :
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Brief :
The petitioner asserts that the judgment dated 20.11.2019 passed by a Division Bench of this Court inCWP No.1551 of 2018, titled Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Versus Union of India & others, has been wilfully disobeyedby the respondents, hence, instant contempt petition has been preferred.
Citation :
COPC No.2 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.2 of 2020
Decided on: 10th November, 2020
Macleods Pharmaceutical Ltd. …..Petitioner
Versus
Prakash Kumar and another .....Respondents
Coram
Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate,
for respondent No.2.
(Through Video Conference)
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge (Oral)
The petitioner asserts that the judgment dated 20.11.2019 passed by a Division Bench of this Court inCWP No.1551 of 2018, titled Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Versus Union of India & others, has been wilfully disobeyedby the respondents, hence, instant contempt petition has been preferred.
2. The aforementioned writ petition was filed by thepetitioner with the submissions that in June, 2017, thepetitioner-company had CENVAT Credit balance of CentralTaxes amounting to Rs.7,51,33,423/-. Petitioner had filed another TRAN-1 form for CENVAT Credit of Rs.14,71,031/-, which was made admissible and credited to its Electronic Credit Ledger account on 26.10.2017. It was further submitted that the company could not amend TRAN-1 formas per the provisions of Goods and Services Tax Act (in short ‘GST Act’).
To know more in details find the attachment file
Input Tax Credit, GST refunds and Recovery of refunds- Roadblocks and way outs
GST LIVE Certification Course - 43rd Weekdays Batch(With Govt Certificate)