Nill Rate of Additional Excise Duty applicable on the day of clearance for yarn

Last updated: 12 October 2023
Quick Summary
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad has ruled that the effective NIL rate of Additional Excise Duty (AED) on the day yarn was cleared for sale is applicable for calculating AED. This decision overturned a demand for AED on yarn manufactured before a notification that removed the duty. The tribunal clarified that while goods were taxable at the time of manufacture, the rate applicable for duty calculation is determined by the clearance date.

Court :
CESTAT, Ahmedabad

Brief :
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of M/s. Emtee Poly Yarn Pvt. Ltd. v. C.C.E. & S.T. VAPI [Excise Appeal No. 11418 of 2014 dated September 11, 2023] allowed the appeal and set aside the demand, holding that the effective NIL rate of Additional Excise Duty ("A.E.D.") on the day of clearance would be applicable for the purpose of calculation of A.E.D. 

Citation :
Excise Appeal No. 11418 of 2014 dated September 11, 2023

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in Excise
Views : 240
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  2. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement
  3. ITAT Jodhpur: Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Merely on General Investigation Report
  4. CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside ₹22.84 Crore Service Tax Demand Against HCL Infosystems
  5. CESTAT Delhi Holds LED Modules Classifiable Under CTH 8539; Rejects Department's Classification Under CTH 9405
  6. Incremental GST burden on pre-GST works contracts is recoverable only from the contracting employer and not from the State or tax authorities
  7. Time Spent in Pursuing Rectification Application under Section 161 of the CGST Act Excludible While Computing Limitation for Filing Appeal under Section 107
  8. Cancellation of GST registration based on defective verification reports fails the statutory test of 'reasons to believe’
  9. Limitation for filing GST appeal runs from the date of actual communication of the order as declared by the dealer unless rebutted by the Revenue through cogent material
  10. Supreme Court: Cruise Operators Eligible for Section 44B Presumptive Taxation; Hospitality Services Do Not Change Nature of ‘Carriage’

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member vinayvinayPro Member Chnmaya parhiChnmaya parhiPro Member Sabareesan S VenkateshSabareesan S VenkateshPro Member Lalan Kumar JhaLalan Kumar JhaPro Member ACCFIN SOLUTIONSACCFIN SOLUTIONS
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category