GST Plus - Get Daily updates,support, whatsapp Group & reply to GST Notices etc.!! Call : 011-411-70713 !!

ICICI

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Neotech Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. , New Delhi Vs. ACIT circle-18(1), New Delhi

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT Delhi

Brief :
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the impugned order dated 30.03.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-37, New Delhi in relation to the assessment year 2010-11

Citation :
ITA NO. 5140/DEL/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC-2’, NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND

SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)

ITA NO. 5140/DEL/2019 A.Y. : 2010-11

M/S NEOTECH NUTRIENTS PVT. LTD.

306, MODI TOWER-98, NEHRU PLACE,

NEW DELHI – 110 019 (PAN: AADCN0622M)

Vs.

ACIT, CIRCLE 18(1), NEW DELHI

(Appellant)

 

(Respondent)

Assessee by

Sh. Shaantanu Jain, Advocate

Department by

Sh. Umeshtakyar, Sr. DR.

ORDER

PER H.S. SIDHU, JM:

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the impugned order dated 30.03.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-37, New Delhi in relation to assessment year 2010-11 on the following grounds:-

"1. Because the action is challenged on facts and law that the reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 are void ab initio on the ground that there was no valid service of notice u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2. Because the action for initiation of reassessment proceedings in unreasonable since while recording reasons, there is non application of mind much less independent application of mind and merely relying upon investigation report by AO, further reasons recorded are vague, lacking tangible material / reasonable cause an justification.

3. Because the action is being challenged since the addition of Rs. 25,00,000/- has been made without having cross examination of the person on whose statement or information the proceedings u/s. 147 were initiated which is in violation of the settled principle of law.

4. Because the action is being challenged since the addition of Rs. 25,00,000/- has been made without making proper investigation from the other party hereby assessee has discharged the onus by providing relevant documents.

5. Because the action for addition u/s. 68 amounting Rs. 25,00,000/- is being challenged on facts and law as the said loan is received by cheque and repaid by cheque after 15 days.

Prayer

For any consequential relief and / or legal claim arising out of this appeal and for any addition, deletion, amendment and modification in the grounds of appeal before the disposal of the same in the interest of substantial justice to the assessee.

2. At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has not pressed the legal grounds involved in ground nos. 1-4 of the appeal, hence, the same are dismissed as not pressed.

3. The facts relating to the issue in dispute is that assessee has filed the return of income at Rs. 5,60,890/- for the assessment year 2010-11 on 1.10.2010. Later on, notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee on 30.03.2017. In response to notice u/s. 148 of the Act, the assessee submitted on 06.10.2017 that return originally filed on 01.10.2010 for AY 2010-11 may be treated as return in response to notice u/s. 148 of the Act. AO, after adopting the prescribed procedures, under the law and considering the reply filed by the assessee, made the addition of Rs. 25 lakh under section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 and completed the assessment under section 147 read with section 143(3) of the  I.T. Act vide order dated 26.12.2017. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 26.12.2017, assessee filed the appeal before the Ld. First Appellate Authority, who vide his impugned order dated 30.03.2019 has dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Now the assessee filed the appeal against the impugned order dated 30.3.2019, before the tribunal.

4. At the time of hearing, Ld. counsel for the assessee draw our attention towards the written submissions alongwith documentary evidences filed by the assessee before the authorities below and especially draw our attention towards page number 30-31 of the paper book and stated that assessee has credited this entry of Rs. 25 lacs and repaid the same in the books of accounts of the assessee which is shown at page number 30 & 31 of the paper book, which remained explained, therefore, section 68 of the I.T. Act is not applicable in the case of the assessee, hence, he requested that the addition in dispute may be deleted.

5. On the other hand, Ld. DR relied upon the orders passed by the revenue authorities.

To read more in details, find the enclosed file

 

Guest
on 01 October 2020
Published in Income Tax
Views : 22
downloaded 7 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags