Madras HC directs Department to Process ITC Claim Rejected Solely on the Basis of Inadvertent Error

Last updated: 24 November 2022
Quick Summary
The Madras High Court has ruled that the GST department must process Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims that were rejected solely due to an inadvertent error. In this case, Abi Egg Traders mistakenly selected 'with payment of tax' instead of 'without payment of tax' when filing their GSTR-3B for exports. The court found the error to be bona fide and affirmed the petitioner's entitlement to ITC on tax-exempt exports, setting aside the rejection.

Court :
Madras HC

Brief :
The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Abi Egg Traders v. Assistant Commissioner, Salem II Division, O/o The Assistant Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax Central Excise [W.P.No.3773 of 2020] ruled in favor of the assessee by directing the department to process the Input Tax Credit ("ITC") claim that were previously rejected solely on the ground of inadvertent error.

Citation :
W.P.No.3773 of 2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 213
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  3. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  4. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  5. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  6. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  7. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  8. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  9. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  10. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member P.VENKATA SATISH KUMARP.VENKATA SATISH KUMARPro Member ABHISHEK RATHOREABHISHEK RATHOREPro Member Tanuj Kumar SharmaTanuj Kumar SharmaPro Member xavierxavierPro Member Arun BoradArun Borad
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category