Legitimate carry forward of ITC cannot be denied for non-filing of TRAN-1


Quick Summary
The Orissa High Court has ruled that legitimate Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied simply because the TRAN-1 form was not filed by the original deadline. In this case, M/s. Sunny Motors was allowed to file their TRAN-1 form due to unforeseen circumstances preventing timely submission. The court referenced previous judgments that allowed electronic or manual filing and extensions due to technical issues.

Court :
Orissa High Court

Brief :
In M/s. Sunny Motors v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Department of Revenue, Govt. of India and Others [W.P.(C) No.9348 of 2020 dated September 16, 2021], the current petition has been filed to direct the Department to accept the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") TRAN-1 form under Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ("CGST Rules") and allow the Input Tax Credit ("ITC") claimed by M/s. Sunny Motors ("the Petitioner").

Citation :
W.P.(C) No.9348 of 2020 dated September 16, 2021

Legitimate carry forward of ITC cannot be denied for non-filing of TRAN-1 - directed Department to permit filing of TRAN-1 till November 01, 2021

In M/s. Sunny Motors v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Department of Revenue, Govt. of India and Others [W.P.(C) No.9348 of 2020 dated September 16, 2021], the current petition has been filed to direct the Department to accept the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") TRAN-1 form under Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ("CGST Rules") and allow the Input Tax Credit ("ITC") claimed by M/s. Sunny Motors ("the Petitioner").

The Petitioner was unable to upload the GST TRAN-1 Form because of some "unavoidable and unforeseen circumstances" within the stipulated time, i.e., December 27, 2017. Due to which, a representation dated June 12, 2019 was made by the Petitioner praying that he be permitted to file the GST TRAN-1 Form manually pursuant to an Order W.P.(C) No.9269 of 2018 dated April 3, 2018 passed by the Hon’ble Orissa High Court. The Department vide a letter dated July 8, 2020 wrote to the Petitioner to submit his invoices in original along with proof of payment of Central Excise Duty to which the Petitioner replied that all documents had already been submitted and that TRAN-1 Form should be accepted. The Petitioner not having heard from the Department since has filed the current petition.

The Hon’ble Orissa High Court relied on the judgment of Aagman Services Private Limited v. Union of India [W.P. (C) No.1329 of 2019 dated November 21, 2019] which permitted the Petitioner in that case to submit his TRAN-1 Form either electronically or manually. Also relied on Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and others, [(2020) 73 GSTR 267] wherein it was observed that extension of date for submitting the declaration electronically on account of technical difficulties on the common portal is permissible under Rule 117(1A) of CGST Rules. The Adfert Technologies Judgment (supra) further provided "no body shall be denied to carry forward legitimate claim of ITC on the ground of non-filing of TRAN-1 by 27th December, 2017."

Taking note and placing reliance on the above mentioned judgments, the court directed the Department to either open the portal to allow the Petitioner to file TRAN-1 Form electronically on or before November 1, 2021 or to accept the form from the Petitioner manually before that date.

FAQ :

No, the court ruled that legitimate Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied solely on the grounds of not filing the TRAN-1 form by the original deadline.

M/s. Sunny Motors was unable to upload their GST TRAN-1 form within the stipulated time due to unavoidable and unforeseen circumstances.

The court directed the Department to either allow M/s. Sunny Motors to file the TRAN-1 form electronically on or before November 1, 2021, or to accept the form manually before that date.

The court relied on the judgments in Aagman Services Private Limited v. Union of India and Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, which allowed for electronic or manual filing and extensions due to technical difficulties.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 222

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
29 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Velionit Consulting PVT LTd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Article Assistant

SGNG & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
27 August 2026
ACCOUNTANT

CHARUPREETI & CO

Noida

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
16 September 2026
Internal Audit - Team Lead

Consulting & Beyond

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Article Assistant

M/s.S.G.Salecha & Co.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details