Kerala HC: No requirement of E-Way Bill for transportation of Used Personal Vehicle


Last updated: 11 September 2021

Court :
Kerala High Court

Brief :
In Assistant State Tax Officer v. VST and Sons and Ors. [WA NO. 914 OF 2021 dated July 22, 2021], Assistant State Tax Officer ("the Petitioner") had filed an appeal challenging the judgement dated October 21, 2020 in WP(C) 22304/2020 in the Kerala High Court. The aforementioned writ petition was filed by VST and Sons ("the Respondent No.1") challenging the detention of the 'RANGE ROVER' motor vehicle belonging to one Muthukumar Meenakshy ("the Respondent No. 2") while being transported from Coimbatore to Thiruvananthapuram as 'used personal effect' of the Respondent No. 2.

Citation :
WA NO. 914 OF 2021 dated July 22, 2021

In Assistant State Tax Officer v. VST and Sons and Ors. [WA NO. 914 OF 2021 dated July 22, 2021], Assistant State Tax Officer ("the Petitioner") had filed an appeal challenging the judgement dated October 21, 2020 in WP(C) 22304/2020 in the Kerala High Court. The aforementioned writ petition was filed by VST and Sons ("the Respondent No.1") challenging the detention of the 'RANGE ROVER' motor vehicle belonging to one Muthukumar Meenakshy ("the Respondent No. 2") while being transported from Coimbatore to Thiruvananthapuram as 'used personal effect' of the Respondent No. 2.

The Petitioner contended that the vehicle was detained on the allegation that the same was transported without the E-way bill as contemplated under Rule 138 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.

The Honorable Kerala High Court took heed of all the facts and evidences at their perusal and opined that goods that are classifiable as used personal and household effect falls under Rule 138 (14) (a) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and are exempted from the requirement of e-way bill. Furthermore, it was noted that the Respondent No. 2 had purchased the vehicle after payment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax ("IGST"). A temporary registration was also taken apart from the motor vehicle insurance.

The decision in the case of Kun Motor Co. Pvt. Ltd. And Vishnu Mohan v. The Asst. State Tax Officer, Squad No. III, Kerala State GST Department And State Of Kerala[2018 (12) TMI 531 - KERALA HIGH COURT] held that used vehicles, even if it has run only negligible distances are to be categorized as 'used personal effects' - the facts in the present appeal is similar if not almost identical to the facts in the above referred decision, except for the change in place from Puducherry to Coimbatore.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 138

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
Featured 24 June 2026
HEAD - AUDIT AND TAXATION

A R JADHAV AND ASSOCIATES

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 09 June 2026
Article Trainee

Numbertree LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details