Justice Ahuja's dissenting judgement: Upheld the constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act
Last updated: 26 June 2021
Court :
Bombay High Court
Brief :
The Hon’ble Bombay HC in Dharmendra M. Jani v. Union of India [W.P. No. 2031 of 2018 dated June 09, 2021] Justice Ujjal Bhuyan held that Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Act, 2017 ('the IGST Act') is ultra vires of Articles 14, 19, 245, 246, 246A, 269A and 286 of the Constitution of India ('the Constitution') and also ultra vires the provision of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('the CGST Act'), IGST Act and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('the MGST Act'). Justice Abhay Ahuja dissented with the Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and opined that Section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act is constitutionally valid and operative for all purposes.
Citation :
W.P. No. 2031 of 2018 dated June 09, 2021
You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :
Stay updated! Stay ads free
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Original Price : INR 2999/-
Offer Price : INR 1999/-
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Know More
Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 200
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
