ITO 22 (1)(4), MUMBAI vs JIGNESH H. RUPARELIA, MUMBAI
Last updated: 28 November 2020
Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
These are appeals by the revenue wherein the revenue is aggrieved that Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] has reduced the addition for bogus purchase done @ 35% for A.Y. 2010-11 & 25% for A.Y. 2011-12 by Assessing Officer by sustaining only 12.5%.
Citation :
I.T.A. No. 2278/Mum/2019
I.T.A. No. 2277/Mum/2019
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Broadcasts
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 143
downloaded 252 times
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
