banner_ad

ITAT Bangalore allows the appeal filed by Rajyalakshmi Reguraj for Statistical purposes


Last updated: 08 January 2021

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 23.05.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2016-2017.

Citation :
ITA No.1717/Bang/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCHES “SMC-A”, BANGALORE

Before Shri George George K, Judicial Member
ITA No.1717/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2016-2017

Rajyalakshmi Reguraj
539, 2nd Main, 2nd State
RMV 3rd Block
Bengaluru – 560 094.
PAN : ACVPB6306M.
(Appellant) 

vs.

The Income Tax Officer
Ward 6(3)(2)
Bangalore.
(Respondent)

Appellant by : Smt.Kavitha Paramesh, CA
Respondent by : Sri.Ganesh R.Ghale, Standing Counsel

Date of Hearing : 04.01.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 05.01.2021

O R D E R

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 23.05.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2016-2017.

2. The solitary issue raised is whether the A.O. and the CIT(A) have erred in restricting deduction u/s 54F of the I.T.Act and adding back to the total income an amount of Rs.11,58,896. 

3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: The assessee is an individual. During the relevant assessment year assessee sold 3000 equity shares in a company called Aditya Auto Products Private Limited for a total consideration of Rs.2,40,00,000. For the assessment year 2016-2017, the return of income was filed declaring total income of Rs.3,02,110. In the return of income, the assessee had declared long term capital gains of Rs.2,05,39,185 on sale of aforementioned shares. Out of the above consideration, theassessee had claimed exemption u/s 54EC and 54F of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs.50,00,000 and Rs.1,55,39,185, respectively. As regards the claim of exemption u/s 54EC of the I.T.Act, there is no dispute. With regard to exemption u/s 54Fof the I.T.Act, the A.O. during the course of assessment proceedings, had called for information from the builder, M/s.Prestige Estates Projects Limited, regarding the amount invested in construction / purchase of a flat. In reply to the A.O.’s query, the builder submitted that the assessee had made payment of only Rs.1,75,83,000 instead of Rs.1,90,00,000 claimed by the assessee.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

CCI Pro

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 80
downloaded 172 times

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details