Court :
 Advance Ruling
        Brief :
  
        Citation :
  
       
							
				
				In a ruling which could affect tax payments of thousands of 
employees of Indian IT companies earning mega bucks on overseas 
assignments, the Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) has said that 
that there was no escape from paying tax on the amount earned during 
a stint with the employer's foreign affiliates. 
If there was a deputation, income tax had to be paid either in 
India, if it had not already been paid abroad, and even a tax treaty 
would not rescue IT professionals. 
"The ruling is relevant for the determination of the income of non-
resident employees sent on deputation abroad, as it specifies that 
it may not only be in India but also other contracting state which 
may have the right to tax same income, depending on the provisions 
contained in the treaty. In a cross-border world with a growing 
trend of mobile executives, this ruling could have a significant 
impact," legal and tax consulting firm Nishith Desai & Associates 
said. 
Income tax department officials , buoyed by the ruling, said this 
could form the basis for dealing with a host of similar cases. The 
logic, they said, was simple. "If the company is subject to Indian 
tax laws, the employee will have to pay taxes in India even if the 
income was earned overseas and the manager had claimed NRI status by 
virtue of having spent the stipulated number of days outside the 
country." 
In the case between the tax department and S Mohan, an Infosys 
employee who went to Norway on deputation, Mohan claimed NRI status 
for tax purposes saying he spent over 183 days outside the country 
during 2005-06. Though he paid income tax on the salary he received 
in India, Mohan sought an AAR ruling on the deputation amount he 
earned since he believed he did not have to pay taxes on it. 
The clause relating to "dependent personal services" (DPS) in the 
India-Norway tax treaty specified that the remuneration earned by 
DPS provider would be taxable in the state of residence (India). 
When the service was provided in another contracting state the other 
state could also tax it. 
The clause relating to elimination of double taxation provided that 
where the income earned by an Indian resident was taxed in Norway, 
the government will have to deduct tax paid in the European country 
from the tax paid in India. 
"In this case the applicant failed to provide any proof that he was 
taxed in Norway or that he had paid tax to Norway, and it was held 
that the applicant was liable to pay tax in India and he was not 
eligible to get any relief under the treaty," it said.