Impugned statutory provision very much applies for the relevant previous year, says ITAT


Last updated: 24 February 2021

Court :
ITAT Hyderabad

Brief :
These two assessee’s appeals for AYs.2017-18 & 2018-19are directed against the CIT(A)–8, Hyderabad’s order dated 22-05-2019 passed in appeal Nos.10147 & 10148/CIT(A)-8/Hyd/2018-19, involving proceedings u/s.200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]

Citation :
ITA 1199/Hyd/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCHES “A” : HYDERABAD
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)

BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

For Assessee : Shri S.Rama Rao, AR
For Revenue : Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, DR

Date of Hearing : 19-01-2021
Date of Pronouncement : 03-02-2021

O R D E R

PER BENCH :

These two assessee’s appeals for AYs.2017-18 & 2018-19are directed against the CIT(A)–8, Hyderabad’s order dated 22-05-2019 passed in appeal Nos.10147 & 10148/CIT(A)-8/Hyd/2018-19, involving proceedings u/s.200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]

2. The assessee’s sole substantive grievance raised in the instant appeals seeks to reverse both the lower authorities’ action in levying late fee of Rs.7,600/- and Rs.13,800/-u/s.234E of the Act; respectively. The CIT(A)’s lower appellatediscussion to this effect, reads as under (extracted from AY.2017-18):

“4. In the appeal, the main contention of the AR is that the provision to include late fee u/s.234E in the intimation u/s. 200A of the Actcame into effect only through the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f.1.6.2015. Section 200A enabling the AO to determine the late fee u/s. 234E brought about w.e.f. 1.6.2015 is prospective in nature and the AO was not empowered to charge late fee u/s.234E for the period prior to 1.6.2015.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

CCI Pro

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members


Follow us