If on Revenues appeal tribunal restored the matter to the AO than assesses appeal has become infructuous
Last updated: 07 April 2012
Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
The grounds raised read as under:
“(i) That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in passing the order u/s. 154 even though there was no error apparent from the record.
(ii) That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in disallowing the deduction u/s 80IB in respect of purported export incentives even though assessee was supporting manufacturer.
(iii) That in any case and any view of the matter, action of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in passing the impugned order u/s. 154 and disallowing the claim u/s. 80IB in respect of purported export incentives in bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case.
Citation :
M/s Mittal Overseas,C/o M/s RRA TaxIndia,D-28, South Extension,Part-I, New Delhi – 110049 (PAN: AAFFM1985R)(Appellant) Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax,Panipat Circle, Panipat (Respondent)
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Broadcasts
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1308
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
